Naíssa Prévide BERNARDO1,2, Aline DE OLIVEIRA1,2, Renata Vieira DA MOTA3, Francisco Mickael de Medeiros CÂMARA3, Isabela PEREGRINO3, Murillo de Albuquerque REGINA3, Eduardo PURGATTO1,2
1 Food Science and Experimental Nutrition Department, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences
2 Food Research Center, University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil
3 Agricultural Research Company of Minas Gerais, Grape and Wine Technological Center, Caldas, MG, Brazil
Email contact: bpnaissa[@]usp.br
AIM: Wine consumption is linked to the aromatic profile, consumer acceptance, and reflects the viticultural and oenological practices applied, together with the study related to clones is a way to evaluate the adaptation, production, and search for differentiated aromatic characteristics. Thus, the aromatic profile of Chardonnay cultivar clone 809 was evaluated, due to its moscato character, in order to verify its potential for sparkling wines in the southeast region of Minas Gerais (Brazil) in comparison to clone 76 that the plantation is predominant in the region.
METHODS: The study was conducted in a 6-year-old experimental altitude vineyard of EPAMIG located at Caldas city, and vinification was performed according to the traditional method, Champenoise (18 months in sur lie). Grapes were harvested in the maturity stage for sparkling wine production and in both fermentation was applied Saccharomyces bayanus yeast. The free volatile compounds were identified by HS-SPME/GC-MS in two consecutive seasons, 2017 and 2018, and in the clones 76 and 809 of Chardonnay cultivar grafted onto 1103 Paulsen and trained on a vertical shoot positioned trellis.
RESULTS: It was pointed out between 54 and 90 compounds in all matrices (berry, must, base wine and sparkling wine), and the number of monoterpenoid compounds found in clone 809 was slightly more than double that found in clone 76 (31 compounds against 14), as was the abundance of these compounds in all of them. The multivariate analysis was applied for the base and sparkling wines evaluation for both clones and seasons, showing that the process steps differentiate in PC 1 (42.3%, base wine x sparkling wine), PC2 discriminated the clones (16.8%, clone 809 x clone 76), and the third component (15.1%) distinguished the base wines in seasons and the sparkling wines were grouped together conforming to the clone. Clone 809 was discriminated according to the following compounds: α-terpineol, linalool, ß-mircene, hotrienol, nerol oxide and limonene.
CONCLUSIONS: According to the multivariate analysis, the sparkling wines were grouped by their clones, suggesting that, regardless of the vintage, the sparkling wine, showed significant influence derived from clone genetics, and that according to the compounds confers floral, fruity and sweet aromas to sparkling wines elaborated with Chardonnay grape berries – clone 809. Although the data showed this difference between Chardonnay clones, the sensory analysis would be an additional tool to confirm the Moscato character and to guide further experiments.
BURDOCK G.A., 2010. Fenaroli’s handbook of flavor ingredients. 2162 p., CRC Press, New York.
CARLIN, S. et al. Reginal features of northern Italian sparkling wines, identified using solid-phase micro extraction and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Food Chemistry, v. 208, p. 68-80, 2016.
ILC T., WERCK-REICHHART D., NAVROT N., 2016. Meta-analysis of the core aroma components of grape and wine aroma. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7 1-15.
KELLER M., 2010. The science of grapevines: anatomy and physiology. 391 p., Elsevier Inc., Washington.
LIN, J.; MASSONNET, M.; CANTU, D. The genetic basis of grape and wine aroma. Horticulture Research, v. 6, p. 1-24, 2019.
SUN, Q. et al. Comparison of odor-active compounds in grapes and wines from Vitis vinifera and non-foxy American grape species. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, v. 59, p. 10657-10664, 2011.